O'Neill gets all the presents. Again.

I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if I discovered that when John O'Neill was a kid he got every last Christmas present he ever wished for.

Because as an adult, or more specifically a sports administrator, nothing's changed for this masterly Aussie manipulator.

In short, whatever John O'Neill wants, John O'Neill gets. Sooner or later.

From sticking it up our puny rugby administration at 2003 World Cup time to overseeing Australia's special exploits before and during the 2006 Football World Cup, the credit must go to O'Neill.

And so it goes with the revamped Super 15 competition from 2011.

After having a few days to soak up all the proposed changes, it's certain to me that there is only one clear-cut winner in nearly every respect.

Always the prime mover and shaker to bring about change to the existing format, O'Neill has again brilliantly manipulated the situation by on the face of it, arguing for everybody's good, but in reality, seeking and achieving maximum advantage for Australia.

With his "saving the rugby world mask on," O'Neill put forth the dictum that "this new structure will enable us to further embed Super Rugby as the premier, provincial competition in world rugby."

Really John? So adding a few extra games and some motley new Australian-based franchise is going to see enthusiasm rival that of the Heineken Cup for example, where crowds of 80,000 plus and vast television audiences are commonplace?

What poppycock. What O'Neill was much more obsessed with all along was simply adding more first-class rugby to an Australian menu which, outside of Super 14, offers Aussie fans very lean pickings.

Australia has never had any domestic competition to rival that of the Currie Cup or the NPC, which is why an extended Super 15 format would fill this huge gap.

O'Neill would obviously have known that to suggest a format that would have tampered with the Currie Cup would have been clearly counter-productive.

Hence, under the new format, current Springboks will be available for Currie Cup duty.

Then again, O'Neill knew that the dysfunctional Air New Zealand Cup presented no such similar problems and that current All Blacks will never play in it again.

Of course, money rules everything and O'Neill also knew that brokering extra cash from Sanzar for all concerned would rule out most fears, gripes and grizzles.

So a new Super 15 tournament that is to be bizarrely interrupted towards the end, a tournament that continues to ignore any chance of Argentina or the Pacific Islands being involved and a tournament that will do its part to extinguish any chance of the Air New Zealand Cup or the Ranfurly Shield recapturing past glory has solved all of John O'Neill's current problems.

If I'm deadly honest, I have to say good on him.

Because deep down, I'm only jealous that we haven't had such a clever, cunning, effective administrator sitting at our Chief Executive's desk for many a moon.

Your thoughts please.

YOUR COMMENTS

6 - 10 of 20 Entries
< Previous Page  |
1  |
2  |
3  |
4  |
Next Page >
basilbrown@rocketmail.com - posted May 27 10:10 am
Don't know why I end up defending MITS hjshaw but your killjoy attitude always really annoys me. Why look for the negative in a blog making another point overall? Do you agree with the J O'Neill stuff? You're wrong anyway...over the last three years, there have been finals crowds of 80k plus at Stade Francais, Twickenham and Croke Park with average crowds double that of our average Super 14 Crowds. I think you're partially confusing the Guiness Premiership crowds with that of the
basilbrown@rocketmail.com - posted May 27 10:13 am
...the Heineken Cup.
haydenjshaw - posted May 27 06:47 pm
Basil did you read the start of what I said??
I am not confusing the GP with the Heineken Cup but I can see how you think that. My point was that there are not big crowds at rugby games every week in the northern hempisphere like we regularly see reported. One game a year hardly makes crowds of over 80000 a regular occurence. I went to the semi last year at Twickers between Toulouse and London Irish. There were around 30000 empty seats there.
haydenjshaw - posted May 27 06:50 pm
I also dont think there have been 80000 at Stade Francais in the last 3 years to watch a HC finals game but I stand to be corrected. Basil can you please direct me to where you have found the figures on average Heineken Cup crowds to average super 14 crowds? I am not questioning you I just cant find it on the internet
basilbrown@rocketmail.com - posted May 28 11:14 am
Average Super 14 crowd in NZ this year just over 14,000. Average Aust Super 14 crowd this year 17,575. Haven't got figures for South Africa but won't come near Heineken figures. Average Heineken Cup crowds this year around 32,800 with finals averaging 55,3000. Stade Francais record is 79,400. HC television audiences obviously swamp dwindling Super 14 TV nos. Do yer research hj shaw. You aren't pretending for a moment that the tired old Super comp has rivalled the HC for popularity ar
Post a comment
6 - 10 of 20 Entries
< Previous Page  |
1  |
2  |
3  |
4  |
Next Page >

 
To post a new comment, you must Sign in first.

YAHOO!XTRA SPORTS:

ALSO ON YAHOO!XTRA:


Search:
Advertise with us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Help
Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! All rights reserved.
Yahoo!Xtra: A Yahoo!7/Telecom New Zealand Company.