O'Neill gets all the presents. Again.

I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if I discovered that when John O'Neill was a kid he got every last Christmas present he ever wished for.

Because as an adult, or more specifically a sports administrator, nothing's changed for this masterly Aussie manipulator.

In short, whatever John O'Neill wants, John O'Neill gets. Sooner or later.

From sticking it up our puny rugby administration at 2003 World Cup time to overseeing Australia's special exploits before and during the 2006 Football World Cup, the credit must go to O'Neill.

And so it goes with the revamped Super 15 competition from 2011.

After having a few days to soak up all the proposed changes, it's certain to me that there is only one clear-cut winner in nearly every respect.

Always the prime mover and shaker to bring about change to the existing format, O'Neill has again brilliantly manipulated the situation by on the face of it, arguing for everybody's good, but in reality, seeking and achieving maximum advantage for Australia.

With his "saving the rugby world mask on," O'Neill put forth the dictum that "this new structure will enable us to further embed Super Rugby as the premier, provincial competition in world rugby."

Really John? So adding a few extra games and some motley new Australian-based franchise is going to see enthusiasm rival that of the Heineken Cup for example, where crowds of 80,000 plus and vast television audiences are commonplace?

What poppycock. What O'Neill was much more obsessed with all along was simply adding more first-class rugby to an Australian menu which, outside of Super 14, offers Aussie fans very lean pickings.

Australia has never had any domestic competition to rival that of the Currie Cup or the NPC, which is why an extended Super 15 format would fill this huge gap.

O'Neill would obviously have known that to suggest a format that would have tampered with the Currie Cup would have been clearly counter-productive.

Hence, under the new format, current Springboks will be available for Currie Cup duty.

Then again, O'Neill knew that the dysfunctional Air New Zealand Cup presented no such similar problems and that current All Blacks will never play in it again.

Of course, money rules everything and O'Neill also knew that brokering extra cash from Sanzar for all concerned would rule out most fears, gripes and grizzles.

So a new Super 15 tournament that is to be bizarrely interrupted towards the end, a tournament that continues to ignore any chance of Argentina or the Pacific Islands being involved and a tournament that will do its part to extinguish any chance of the Air New Zealand Cup or the Ranfurly Shield recapturing past glory has solved all of John O'Neill's current problems.

If I'm deadly honest, I have to say good on him.

Because deep down, I'm only jealous that we haven't had such a clever, cunning, effective administrator sitting at our Chief Executive's desk for many a moon.

Your thoughts please.

YOUR COMMENTS

16 - 20 of 20 Entries
< Previous Page  |
1  |
2  |
3  |
4  |
Next Page >
morrowguy52 - posted May 29 12:05 am
You say fair enopugh point hjshaw...then go back to blaming the media. Seems to me that like all the snarly stuff you write, you have a real hidden agenda. Trotting out nonsense like "how many Chiefs fans etc...: doesnt in any way disguise the fact that real apathy has set in regarding rugby as declining viewing figures indicate. Well said tup-pence...at least you have grasped and accepted the point of MITS's blog. Of course, hjshaw won't accept that.
haydenjshaw - posted May 29 07:34 am
Morrow I would like to know what my hidden agenda is? What could it possibly be? Because I think the media are in general right at the bottom of the scrapheap in society does not mean I have a hidden agenda.I do agree with MITS about O'Neil there is no question he is a great administrator. If you read the 1st line of my 1st comment you will see that I acknowleged that what I was saying was not the point of the blog. I think saying that regular crowds of over 80000 in the HC is wrong that is
morrowguy52 - posted May 29 08:49 am
For such a hater of the sports media, your obvious addiction to reading and replying to blogs is hypocritical behaviour of the highest order.
basilbrown@rocketmail.com - posted May 29 09:42 am
I stand by my figures hjshaw. I notice you conveniently ducked whether Stade de France has had a crowd of 80k approx along with Twickenham and Croke Park.
haydenjshaw - posted May 29 05:47 pm
Basil you are a dreamer. Is THE offiial site with THE official figures not correct??? You originally said Stade de France had 80000 for a final in the last 3 years. That is wrong. Yes they had 80000 for another game but not a final. If you cannot agree with the figures on their offical website then I am wasting my time replying to someone who obviously cant stand the fact he was completley 100% totally wrong. Pathetic, absolutely pathetic
Post a comment
16 - 20 of 20 Entries
< Previous Page  |
1  |
2  |
3  |
4  |
Next Page >

 
To post a new comment, you must Sign in first.

YAHOO!XTRA SPORTS:

ALSO ON YAHOO!XTRA:


Search:
Advertise with us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Help
Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! All rights reserved.
Yahoo!Xtra: A Yahoo!7/Telecom New Zealand Company.