O'Neill gets all the presents. Again.

I wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if I discovered that when John O'Neill was a kid he got every last Christmas present he ever wished for.

Because as an adult, or more specifically a sports administrator, nothing's changed for this masterly Aussie manipulator.

In short, whatever John O'Neill wants, John O'Neill gets. Sooner or later.

From sticking it up our puny rugby administration at 2003 World Cup time to overseeing Australia's special exploits before and during the 2006 Football World Cup, the credit must go to O'Neill.

And so it goes with the revamped Super 15 competition from 2011.

After having a few days to soak up all the proposed changes, it's certain to me that there is only one clear-cut winner in nearly every respect.

Always the prime mover and shaker to bring about change to the existing format, O'Neill has again brilliantly manipulated the situation by on the face of it, arguing for everybody's good, but in reality, seeking and achieving maximum advantage for Australia.

With his "saving the rugby world mask on," O'Neill put forth the dictum that "this new structure will enable us to further embed Super Rugby as the premier, provincial competition in world rugby."

Really John? So adding a few extra games and some motley new Australian-based franchise is going to see enthusiasm rival that of the Heineken Cup for example, where crowds of 80,000 plus and vast television audiences are commonplace?

What poppycock. What O'Neill was much more obsessed with all along was simply adding more first-class rugby to an Australian menu which, outside of Super 14, offers Aussie fans very lean pickings.

Australia has never had any domestic competition to rival that of the Currie Cup or the NPC, which is why an extended Super 15 format would fill this huge gap.

O'Neill would obviously have known that to suggest a format that would have tampered with the Currie Cup would have been clearly counter-productive.

Hence, under the new format, current Springboks will be available for Currie Cup duty.

Then again, O'Neill knew that the dysfunctional Air New Zealand Cup presented no such similar problems and that current All Blacks will never play in it again.

Of course, money rules everything and O'Neill also knew that brokering extra cash from Sanzar for all concerned would rule out most fears, gripes and grizzles.

So a new Super 15 tournament that is to be bizarrely interrupted towards the end, a tournament that continues to ignore any chance of Argentina or the Pacific Islands being involved and a tournament that will do its part to extinguish any chance of the Air New Zealand Cup or the Ranfurly Shield recapturing past glory has solved all of John O'Neill's current problems.

If I'm deadly honest, I have to say good on him.

Because deep down, I'm only jealous that we haven't had such a clever, cunning, effective administrator sitting at our Chief Executive's desk for many a moon.

Your thoughts please.

YOUR COMMENTS

11 - 15 of 20 Entries
< Previous Page  |
1  |
2  |
3  |
4  |
Next Page >
haydenjshaw - posted May 28 06:31 pm
Of course actual numbers are higher in the HC than the super14. There are more people that live in the UK alone than Australia, NZ and SA combined. I have lived in the UK for 3 years and I can tell you rugby is not very popular. I could go around my office and ask who Steve Borthwick is and maybe 1 in 20 would know. Why is the super14 tired? Because the media keep telling us it is? The HC is the same thing year after year too and in my opinion a lower standard of rugby
haydenjshaw - posted May 28 07:10 pm
Basil not quite sure where you got your average HC crowd figures from but I HAVE done some research. On the official site it has the crowd numbers for every game. Pool play average crowds were 12231 and knock out crowds averaged 42058. The overall average for a Hieneken Cup game during the 2008/09 season was 14874. www.ercrugby.com if you want the proof
morrowguy52 - posted May 28 07:54 pm
As a bystander watching you two swap figures, I have to say hjshaw that you do your credibility no good at all when you're happy to make out the widely-recognised, dull, overall standard of the Super 14 for most of the 2009 tournament is purely a creation of the media. Utter rubbish. Who do you talk to or do you just talk into your computer screen? Blaming the media is such a tired old chestnut and weakens your argument considerably.
haydenjshaw - posted May 28 09:00 pm
Fair enough point morrow however I do believe that the media most certainly has had its part to play in it. Although it is not their job to be cheerleaders I do not see why they have been biting the hand that feeds them since we didnt win the WC in 2007. Why concentrate on all the negatives and ignore the positives? They are there because of rugby not the other way around. How many Chiefs fans think it has been a dull competition? Blaming the media is not a tired chestnut if it is true.
tup_pence@xtra.co.nz - posted May 28 09:27 pm
O~Neill works for the good of rugby(as he sees it)in Aussie.It is a pity that he is not matched on this side of the ditch.He is astute and runs rings around our negotiators.
Post a comment
11 - 15 of 20 Entries
< Previous Page  |
1  |
2  |
3  |
4  |
Next Page >

 
To post a new comment, you must Sign in first.

YAHOO!XTRA SPORTS:

ALSO ON YAHOO!XTRA:


Search:
Advertise with us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Help
Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! All rights reserved.
Yahoo!Xtra: A Yahoo!7/Telecom New Zealand Company.